Bioinformatic design and pilot validation of a PCR assay for species-level identification of Candida spp. in biological samples

Dmytro Prokhorenko*

dmtr.prokhorenko@outlook.com

Abstract

Species-level identification of representatives of the genus Candida in complex biological samples of natural, agrobiological and technological origin is necessary for the accurate analysis of mixed microbial communities, the control of microbial contamination and the assessment of potential sources of fungal pathogen dissemination. This study aimed to provide bioinformatic justification, design and preliminary laboratory verification of a polymerase chain reaction system for the species‑level differentiation of Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida auris. The study included analysis of the ribosomal cluster, selection of reference sequences, in silico design of primers and hydrolysis probes, assessment of their specificity, optimisation of the reaction mixture and testing on control samples of DNA and archived isolates of biological origin. The internal transcribed spacer region of the ribosomal cluster was selected as the main target, as it combines conserved flanking fragments with variable internal sequences. Primer-probe sets were developed for Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida auris, with amplicon sizes of 82, 91 and 118 base pairs, respectively. The amplification reaction was performed in a final volume of 25 µl. The final concentration of each primer was 0.28 µM; the concentration of the hydrolysis probe was 0.2 µM, MgCl₂ 3 mM, dNTPs 0.3 mM and betaine 1.5 M. Positive amplification was obtained for 40 positive control samples, including 29 Candida spp. samples, 7 Candida glabrata samples and 4 Candida parapsilosis samples. No cross-reactivity was detected in the negative control panel, which included 43 samples of non-target microorganisms. The proposed system confirmed its suitability for primary qualitative analytical species-level identification of selected representatives of the genus Candida under controlled laboratory conditions. The developed approach may serve as a basis for further sanitary and biological screening of complex matrices of soil, aquatic and plant microbiota, for biosafety control in the agro-industrial sector, and for subsequent adaptation to the early molecular detection of fungal pathogens relevant to invasive infections

Keywords

ribosomal cluster; yeast-like fungi; probes; screening; microbial contamination; microorganisms

Suggested citation
Prokhorenko, D. (2026). Bioinformatic design and pilot validation of a PCR assay for species-level identification of Candida spp. in biological samples. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 17(3), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.31548/biologiya/3.2026.38
References
  1. Akinbobola, A.B., Kean, R., Hanifi, S.M., & Quilliam, R.S. (2023). Environmental reservoirs of the drug-resistant pathogenic yeast Candida auris. PLoS Pathogens, 19(4), article number e1011268. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011268.
  2. Allison, J.C., & Hyland, E.M. (2025). From crops to clinic: The impact of dual azole use on antifungal resistance in Candida and Candida associated yeasts. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16, article number 1656723. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1656723.
  3. Ambrosio III, F.J., Scribner, M.R., Wright, S.M., Otieno, J.R., Doughty, E.L., Gorzalski, A., Siao, D., Killian, S., & Hess, D. (2023). TheiaEuk: A species-agnostic bioinformatics workflow for fungal genomic characterization. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, article number 1198213. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1198213.
  4. Babler, K., et al. (2023). Detection of the clinically persistent, pathogenic yeast spp. Candida auris from hospital and municipal wastewater in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Science of the Total Environment, 898, article number 165459. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165459.
  5. Barber, C., Crank, K., Papp, K., Innes, G.K., Schmitz, B.W., Chavez, J., Rossi, A., & Gerrity, D. (2023). Community-scale wastewater surveillance of Candida auris during an ongoing outbreak in Southern Nevada. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(4), 1755-1763. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c07763.
  6. Berg, G., & Cernava, T. (2022). The plant microbiota signature of the Anthropocene as a challenge for microbiome research. Microbiome, 10(1), article number 54. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01224-5.
  7. Buil, J.B., van den Bosch, B., van der Maas, S.J., Meijer, E.F., de Groot, T., Meletiadis, J., & Pas, S.D. (2025). Performance evaluation of five real‐time PCR assays for the detection of Candida auris DNA. Mycoses, 68(5), article number e70065. doi: 10.1111/myc.70065.
  8. Chialva, M., Lanfranco, L., & Bonfante, P. (2022). The plant microbiota: Composition, functions, and engineering. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 73, 135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.07.003.
  9. Corrêa-Moreira, D., da Costa, G.L., de Lima Neto, R.G., Pinto, T., Salomão, B., Fumian, T.M., Mannarino, C., Prado, T., & Oliveira, M.M. (2024). Screening of Candida spp. in wastewater in Brazil during COVID-19 pandemic: Workflow for monitoring fungal pathogens. BMC Biotechnology, 24(1), article number 43. doi: 10.1186/s12896-024-00868-z.
  10. Djemiel, C., et al. (2024). Unraveling biogeographical patterns and environmental drivers of soil fungal diversity at the French national scale. Soil, 10(1), 251-273. doi: 10.5194/soil-10-251-2024.
  11. Fadiji, A.E., Adeniji, A., Lanrewaju, A.A., Adedayo, A.A., Chukwuneme, C.F., Nwachukwu, B.C., Aderibigbe, J., & Omomowo, I.O. (2025). Key challenges in plant microbiome research in the next decade. Microorganisms, 13(11), article number 2546. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13112546.
  12. Fisher, M.C., et al. (2024). A one health roadmap towards understanding and mitigating emerging fungal antimicrobial resistance: fAMR. Npj Antimicrobials and Resistance, 2, article number 36. doi: 10.1038/s44259-024-00055-2.
  13. Freitas, B.L., Leach, L., Chaturvedi, V., & Chaturvedi, S. (2022). Reverse transcription-quantitative real-time PCR assay for the rapid enumeration of live Candida auris cells from the healthcare environment. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 60(2), article number e00779-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00779-21.
  14. Kowalska, J., Krzymińska, J., & Tyburski, J. (2022). Yeasts as a potential biological agent in plant disease protection and yield improvement – a short review. Agriculture, 12(9), article number 1404. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12091404.
  15. Lima, A., Widen, R., Vestal, G., Uy, D., & Silbert, S. (2019). A TaqMan probe-based real-time PCR assay for the rapid identification of the emerging multidrug-resistant pathogen Candida auris on the BD Max system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 57(7), article number e01604-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01604-18.
  16. Oliveira, M.M., Proenca, A.M., Moreira‐Silva, E., Dos Santos, F.M., Marconatto, L., de Castro, A.M., & Medina‐Silva, R. (2022). Biochemical features and early adhesion of marine Candida parapsilosis strains on high‐density polyethylene. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 132(3), 1954-1966. doi: 10.1111/jam.15369.
  17. Orsud, H., Zoughbor, S., AlDhaheri, F., Hajissa, K., Refaey, S., Ajab, A., Alswaider, R., Mohamed, S., Alkaabi, O., & Al Rasbi, Z. (2025). Multi-marker comparative analysis of 18S, ITS1, and ITS2 primers for mycobiome profiling. Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 5, article number 1690766. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2025.1690766.
  18. Pham, P., Shi, Y., Khan, I., Sumarah, M., Renaud, J., Sunohara, M., Craiovan, E., Lapen, D., Aris-Brosou, S., & Chen, W. (2024). The functions and factors governing fungal communities and diversity in agricultural waters: Insights into the ecosystem services aquatic mycobiota provide. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, article number 1460330. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1460330.
  19. Rivera-Zizumbo, A.A., Velez, P., Ojeda, M., Herrera-Mares, A., Tapia-Torres, Y., & Gasca-Pineda, J. (2024). Implementing ITS1 metabarcoding for the analysis of soil microeukariotic diversity in the Mountain Cloud Forest. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 24(8), 3001-3012. doi: 10.1007/s11368-024-03839-1.
  20. Rossi, A., Chavez, J., Iverson, T., Hergert, J., Oakeson, J., LaCross, N., Njoku, C., Gorzalski, A., & Gerrity, D. (2023). Candida auris discovery through community wastewater surveillance during healthcare outbreak, Nevada, USA, 2022. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 29(2), 422-425. doi: 10.3201/eid2902.221523.
  21. Sautour, M., Lemaître, J.P., Ranjard, L., Truntzer, C., Basmaciyan, L., Depret, G., Hartmann, A., & Dalle, F. (2021). Detection and survival of Candida albicans in soils. Environmental DNA, 3(6), 1093-1101. doi: 10.1002/edn3.230.
  22. Sayers, E.W., Cavanaugh, M., Clark, K., Pruitt, K.D., Sherry, S.T., Yankie, L., & Karsch-Mizrachi, I. (2024a). GenBank 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Research, 52(1), 134-137. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad903.
  23. Sayers, E.W., et al. (2024b). Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Research, 52(1), 33-43. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad1044.
  24. Schoch, C.L., Seifert, K.A., Huhndorf, S., Robert, V., Spouge, J.L., Levesque, C.A., & White, M.M. (2012). Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(16), 6241-6246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117018109.
  25. Silva, I., Miranda, I.M., & Costa-de-Oliveira, S. (2024). Potential environmental reservoirs of Candida auris: A systematic review. Journal of Fungi, 10(5), article number 336. doi: 10.3390/jof10050336.
  26. Tavares, E.R., Santos, V.P., Castro, I.M., Borges, P.H., Silva-Rodrigues, G., Olak, A.P., Santos, J., Morey, A., & Yamauchi, L.M. (2025). Development of melting-curve-based real-time PCR for differentiating medically important candida species. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(19), article number 9411. doi: 10.3390/ijms26199411.
  27. Thalinger, B., Deiner, K., Harper, L.R., Rees, H., Blackman, R., Sint, D., Traugott, M., Goldberg, C., & Bruce, K. (2021). A validation scale to determine the readiness of environmental DNA assays for routine species monitoring. Environmental DNA, 3(4), 823-836. doi: 10.1002/edn3.189.
  28. Valério, A.D., de Menezes, G.C., Rosa, C.A., & Johann, S. (2025). Into the wild: A look at Candida albicans outside the clinical setting. Journal of Fungi, 11(9), article number 622. doi: 10.3390/jof11090622.
  29. Viotti, C., Chalot, M., Kennedy, P.G., Maillard, F., Santoni, S., Blaudez, D., & Bertheau, C. (2024). Primer pairs, PCR conditions, and peptide nucleic acid clamps affect fungal diversity assessment from plant root tissues. Mycology, 15(2), 255-271. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2023.2301003.
  30. Winand, R., D’hooge, E., Van Uffelen, A., Bogaerts, B., Braekel, J., Hoffman, S., Roosens, N., Becker, P., Keersmaecker, S., & Vanneste, K. (2025). Investigating fungal diversity through metabarcoding for environmental samples: Assessment of ITS1 and ITS2 Illumina sequencing using multiple defined mock communities with different classification methods and reference databases. BMC Genomics, 26, article number 729. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11917-y.
  31. Zhu, S., Lei, Y., Wang, C., Wei, Y., Wang, C., & Sun, Y. (2021). Patterns of yeast diversity distribution and its drivers in rhizosphere soil of Hami melon orchards in different regions of Xinjiang. BMC Microbiology, 21(1), 170. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02222-1.
  32. Zulli, A., Chan, E.M., Shelden, B., Duong, D., Xu, X.S., White, B.J., Wolfe, M.K., & Boehm, A.B. (2024). Prospective study of Candida auris nucleic acids in wastewater solids in 190 wastewater treatment plants in the United States suggests widespread occurrence. mBio, 15(8), article number e00908-24. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00908-24.