Detection and identification of soy viruses by molecular diagnostics methods

Kateryna Hrynchuk, Ihor Antipov
Abstract

Viral plant diseases are one of the main causes of soybean crop losses in Ukraine, and the lack of systematic monitoring and limited use of modern diagnostic methods make it difficult to effectively control the spread of viral pathogens. The purpose of the study was to assess the prevalence of major viral pathogens in soybean crops in the Central Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. A combination of serological analysis and molecular method was used to detect soybean mosaic virus, soybean vein necrosis virus, and alfalfa mosaic virus. The results showed that the overall infection rate of soybean crops was 40.7% according to real-time polymerase chain reaction data with reverse transcription. The species composition of pathogens showed clear differentiation: soybean mosaic virus was detected in 20.0% of samples, soybean vein necrosis virus – in 8.0%, alfalfa mosaic virus – in 7.3%. The real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction method showed higher sensitivity compared to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method, revealing an additional 13 positive samples. The most significant discrepancies between the methods were observed when detecting alfalfa mosaic virus, where the molecular method detected 50% more positive samples. Regional analysis revealed the highest infection rate in the Cherkasy Oblast (44.0%), with the maximum prevalence of soybean mosaic virus (22.0%). A moderate correlation was found between symptom severity and threshold cycle values for soybean mosaic virus (r = -0.62), whereas for soybean vein necrosis virus and alfalfa mosaic virus, the correlation was statistically insignificant. The results confirmed the high prevalence of viral infections among soybean crops in the study region. The results obtained will allow stating phytosanitary services, breeding institutions, and agricultural producers to implement regional-differentiated strategies for protecting soybeans, which will reduce crop losses and increase the effectiveness of phytosanitary measures

Keywords

serological analysis; polymerase chain reaction; enzyme immunoassay; co-infection; phytosanitary monitoring

Suggested citation
Hrynchuk, K., & Antipov, I. (2025). Detection and identification of soy viruses by molecular diagnostics methods. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 16(3), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.31548/biologiya/3.2025.74
References
  1. Abdalla, O.A., Al-Shahwan, I.M., Al-Saleh, M.A., & Amer, M.A. (2020). Molecular characterisation of Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV) isolates in alfalfa and other plant species in different regions in Saudi Arabia. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 156, 603-613. doi: 10.1007/s10658-019-01910-z.
  2. Bhagwatkar, D.N., Sandra, N., Tripathi, A., Dalal, G., Kesaratagi, S., Saini, M., Lal, S.K., & Lal, S.K. (2025). Seed transmission of Carlavirus vignae (Cowpea mild mottle virus): A hidden driver of veinal necrosis and bud blight disease in soybean (Glycine max) in India. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16, article number 1654471. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1654471.
  3. Bisht, A., et al. (2023). Multi-omics assisted breeding for biotic stress resistance in soybean. Molecular Biology Reports, 50, 3787-3814. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-08260-4.
  4. Chu, J., Li, W., Piao, D., Lin, F., Huo, X., Zhang, H., Du, H., Kong, Y., Jin, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, C. (2021). Identification of a major QTL related to resistance to Soybean mosaic virus in diverse soybean genetic populations. Euphytica, 217, article number 176. doi: 10.1007/s10681-021-02907-8.
  5. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030#Text
  6. Dawoud, R. (2025). Alfamovirus (Alfalfa Mosaic Virus). In N. Amaresan & K. Kumar (Eds), Compendium of phytopathogenic microbes in agro-ecology: Vol. 2 viruses and viroids (pp. 51-68). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-81884-4_3.
  7. Dunich, A., Kyrychenko, S., Mishchenko, I., Molodchenkova, O., Bondus, R., Dashenko, A., & Mishchenko, L. (2024). Diagnostics of the most dangerous potato and soybean viruses in 2024 as the first stage in the search for donors of genes responsible for resistance to viruses. Quarantine and plant protection, 4, 12-17. doi: 10.36495/2312-0614.2024.4.12-17.
  8. Elmore, M.G., et al. (2022). Detection and discovery of plant viruses in soybean by metagenomic sequencing. Virology Journal, 19, article number 149. doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01872-5.
  9. Fowkes, A.R., McGreig, S., Pufal, H., Duffy, S., Howard, B., Adams, I.P., Macarthur, R., Weekes, R., & Fox, A. (2021). Integrating high throughput sequencing into survey design reveals Turnip yellows virus and Soybean dwarf virus in pea (Pisum sativum) in the Unite4ud Kingdom. Viruses, 13(12), article number 2530. doi: 10.3390/v13122530.
  10. Groves, C., German, T., Dasgupta, R., Mueller, D., & Smith, D.L. (2016). Seed transmission of Soybean vein necrosis virus: The first Tospovirus implicated in seed transmission. PloS one, 11(1), article number e0147342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147342
  11. Hameed, A. (2020). Tripartite interactions among soybean vein necrosis orthotospovirus, vector thrips and soybean plants. (Doctoral thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, USA).
  12. Hameed, A., Rosa, C., & Rajotte, E.G. (2022). A review on ecology of interactions in Soybean vein necrosis orthotospovirus (SVNV): Plants, vectors, virus dispersal and management perspectives. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.102423
  13. Hobbs, H.A., Domier, L.L., & Nelson, B.D. (2012). First report of Alfalfa mosaic virus and Soybean dwarf virus on soybean in North Dakota. Plant Disease, 96(12), 1829-1829. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-12-0673-PDN
  14. Hosseini, B., Voegele, R.T., & Link, T.I. (2023). Diagnosis of soybean diseases caused by fungal and oomycete pathogens: Existing methods and new developments. Journal of Fungi, 9(5), article number 587. doi: 10.3390/jof9050587.
  15. Khatun, M.F., Kwak, M., Kwon, M., Hossain, M.M., & Kil, E.J. (2025). New insights into viral threats in soybean (Glycine max) crops from Bangladesh, including a novel crinivirus. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16, article number 1523767. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1523767.
  16. Lin, F., et al. (2022). Breeding for disease resistance in soybean: A global perspective. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 135, 3773-3872. doi: 10.1007/s00122-022-04101-3.
  17. Luan, H., Liao, W., Song, Y., Niu, H., Hu, T., & Zhi, H. (2020). Transgenic plant generated by RNAi-mediated knocking down of soybean Vma12 and Soybean mosaic virus resistance evaluation. AMB Express, 10(1), article number 62. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-00997-6.
  18. Luo, Y., Na, R., Nowak, J.S., Qiu, Y., Lu, Q.S., Yang, C., Marsolais, F., & Tian, L. (2021). Development of a Csy4-processed guide RNA delivery system with soybean-infecting virus ALSV for genome editing. BMC Plant Biology, 21(1), article number 419. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03138-8.
  19. McCaghey, M., Shao, D., Kurcezewski, J., Lindstrom, A., Ranjan, A., Whitham, S. A., Conley, S.P., Williams, B., Smith, D.L., & Kabbage, M. (2021). Host-induced gene silencing of a Sclerotinia sclerotiorum oxaloacetate acetylhydrolase using Bean pod mottle virus as a vehicle reduces disease on soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, article number 677631. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.677631.
  20. Mishchenko, L., Dunich, A., Mishchenko, I., Dashchenko, A., & Kandaurova, K. (2022). Seed-borne and seed-transmitted viral diseases and their effect on yield of different soybean genotypes. Poljoprivreda i Sumarstvo, 68(4), 165-175. doi: 10.17707/AgricultForest.68.4.13.
  21. Rahman, S.U., McCoy, E., Raza, G., Ali, Z., Mansoor, S., & Amin, I. (2023). Improvement of soybean; A way forward transition from genetic engineering to new plant breeding technologies. Molecular Biotechnology, 65, 162-180. doi: 10.1007/s12033-022-00456-6.
  22. Ribeiro-Junior, M.R., Espindola, A., Nascimento, D.M., da Silva, F.B., Krause-Sakate, R., & Ochoa-Corona, F.M. (2025). An attempt toward the global screening of soybean viruses using EDNA-MiFi-based electronic probes. PhytoFrontiers, 5(2), 236-242. doi: 10.1094/PHYTOFR-12-24-0141-FI.
  23. Sandra, N., Tripathi, A., Lal, S.K., Mandal, B., & Jain, R.K. (2021). Molecular and biological characterization of Soybean yellow mottle mosaic virus severe strain infecting soybean in India. 3 Biotech, 11(8), article number 381. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02925-2.
  24. Solomiichuk, M., & Pikovskyi, M. (2021). The effect of the Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteria and substances of a stimulating nature on the productivity of the soybean plant and seed damage by pathogens. Plant and Soil Science, 12(4), 28-36. doi: 10.31548/agr2021.04.0028.
  25. Tatineni, S., & Hein, G.L. (2023). Plant viruses of agricultural importance: Current and future perspectives of virus disease management strategies. Phytopathology, 113(2), 117-141. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-22-0167-RVW.
  26. Uge, E., Sidik, E.A., Cahyaningrum, H., Hartono, S., Baliadi, Y., Yusnawan, E., & Inayati, A. (2023). Identification and assessment of superior indonesian soybean cultivars resistant to Mosaic and Mottling Viruses. Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 54(10). doi: 10.62321/issn.1000-1298.2023.10.10.
  27. Usovsky, M., et al. (2022). Decades of genetic research on Soybean mosaic virus resistance in soybean. Viruses, 14(6), article number 1122. doi: 10.3390/v14061122.
  28. Wang, D., Chen, S., Huang, Z., & Lin, J. (2022). Identification and mapping of genetic locus conferring resistance to multiple plant viruses in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 135(9), 3293-3305. doi: 10.1007/s00122-022-04187-9.
  29. Xue, B., Shang, J., Yang, J., Zhang, L., Du, J. B., Yu, L., Yang, W., & Naeem, M. (2021). Development of a multiplex RT-PCR assay for the detection of Soybean mosaic virus, Bean common mosaic virus and Cucumber mosaic virus in field samples of soybean. Journal of Virological Methods, 298, article number 114278. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114278.
  30. Yin, J., et al. (2021). A cell wall-localized NLR confers resistance to Soybean mosaic virus by recognizing viral-encoded cylindrical inclusion protein. Molecular Plant, 14(11), 1881-1900. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.07.013.
  31. Zambrana-Echevarría, C. (2021). Development of tools for the management of Soybean vein necrosis orthotospovirus and Tobacco streak ilarvirus in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). (Doctoral thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA).
  32. Zhang, K., Wu, Q., & Chen, Y. (2021). Detecting soybean leaf disease from synthetic image using multi-feature fusion faster R-CNN. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 183, article number 106064. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106064.
  33. Zhou, J., & Tzanetakis, I.E. (2020). Soybean vein necrosis orthotospovirus can move systemically in soybean in the presence of Bean pod mottle virus. Virus Genes, 56(1), 104-107. doi: 10.1007/s11262-019-01715-6.