Efficacy of the combined application of biological products in soybean cultivation under laboratory and field conditions

Yuliia Kolomyets, Nataliia Serhiychuk, Tetiana Rozhkova
Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of biological products through the soybean response across sowing, growth, phytosanitary, symbiotic, and productivity parameters under laboratory and field conditions. The study employed spectrophotometry, the Kjeldahl method, Soxhlet extraction, and analysis of variance. Under laboratory conditions, the combined seed treatment with Phytovit and Avercom yielded the highest germination energy of 88.7%, exceeding the control by 10.1 percentage points. Laboratory germination under this treatment was 94.3%, which was 7.9 percentage points higher than the control, whilst seedling infection by microflora decreased to 4.2%, representing a reduction of 7.6 percentage points. Under field conditions, the application of biological products had a positive effect on seedling emergence, plant stand density, development of the leaf apparatus, and root system. Under the combined application of the products, field germination was 87.1%, and the number of nodules at the V5 stage reached 20.6 per plant. The phytosanitary condition of the crop also shifted towards a reduction in disease incidence and pest damage: the incidence of root rot decreased to 6.3%, and the biological efficacy of protection was 59.6%. At the flowering stage, the combined treatment promoted the formation of a more developed assimilatory and symbiotic apparatus in the plants. The leaf area index reached 4.0 m²/m², the number of active nodules was 25.9 per plant, and their mass was 0.58 g per plant, reflecting more active functioning of the leaf apparatus and root system during the transition of plants to reproductive development. The preservation of the leaf apparatus and nodule formation were accompanied by subsequent seed filling and accumulation of productive mass. Seed yield under the combined application of Phytovit and Avercom was 3.01 t/ha, the increase over the control was 24.4%, protein content was 39.1%, and oil content was 21.0%. The practical value of the study lies in the possibility of using its findings by agronomists, farmers, seed enterprises, and researchers to substantiate biological treatment of soybean, taking into account germination, phytosanitary condition, nodulation, yield, and seed quality

Keywords

phytosanitary condition; plant stand density; root system; number of nodules; reproductive organs

Suggested citation
Kolomyets, Yu., Serhiychuk, N., & Rozhkova, T. (2026). Efficacy of the combined application of biological products in soybean cultivation under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 17(2), 106-124. https://doi.org/10.31548/biologiya/2.2026.106
References
  1. Afzal, A., & Mukhtar, T. (2024). Revolutionizing nematode management to achieve global food security goals: An overview. Heliyon, 10(3), article number e25325. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25325.
  2. Berdin, S.I., Murach, O.M., Kolisnyk, O.M., & Tryus, V.O. (2024). Soybean yield depending on pre-sowing seed treatment schemes with biological preparations of different action. Agrarian Innovations, 24, 24-30. doi: 10.32848/agrar.innov.2024.24.3.
  3. Bueno, A.D.F., Sutil, W.P., Jahnke, S.M., Carvalho, G.A., Cingolani, M.F., Colmenarez, Y.C., & Corniani, N. (2023). Biological control as part of the soybean integrated pest management (IPM): Potential and challenges. Agronomy, 13(10), article number 2532. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13102532.
  4. Compant, S., Cassan, F., Kostić, T., Johnson, L., Brader, G., Trognitz, F., & Sessitsch, A. (2025). Harnessing the plant microbiome for sustainable crop production. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 23, 9-23. doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01079-1.
  5. Convention on Biological Diversity. (2016, May). Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/convention/text.
  6. Dass, A., Singh, A., Nithinkumar, K., Rajanna, G.A., Verma, R.K., Rathore, S.S., & Meena, V.S. (2025). Synergies and trade-offs of integrating bio-formulations with mineral fertilizers in soybean under the climate crisis: Implications for productivity, profitability, and nutrient-use efficiency. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 24, article number 102474. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102474.
  7. Dymytrov, S., & Sabluk, V. (2023). Effectiveness of seed treatment with biopreparations for increasing soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) productivity. International Science Journal of Engineering & Agriculture, 2(3), 67-81. doi: 10.46299/j.isjea.20230203.07.
  8. Gonçalves e Silva, J.A., et al. (2024). Integration crop-livestock system increases the sustainability of soybean cultivation through improved soil health and plant physiology. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 359, article number 108770. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2023.108770.
  9. ISTA. (n.d.). International rules for seed testing. Retrieved from https://www.seedtest.org/en/international-rules-for-seed-testing-_content---1--1083.html.
  10. Johnson, R., Joel, J.M., & Puthur, J.T. (2024). Biostimulants: The futuristic sustainable approach for alleviating crop productivity and abiotic stress tolerance. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 43(3), 659-674. doi: 10.1007/s00344-023-11144-3.
  11. Khan, A., Singh, A.V., Gautam, S.S., Agarwal, A., Punetha, A., Upadhayay, V.K., Kukreti, B., Bundela, V., Jugran, A.K., & Goel, R. (2023). Microbial bioformulation: A microbial assisted biostimulating fertilization technique for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, article number 1270039. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1270039.
  12. Khan, M.T., Aleinikovienė, J., & Butkevičienė, L.-M. (2024). Innovative organic fertilizers and cover crops: Perspectives for sustainable agriculture in the era of climate change and organic agriculture. Agronomy, 14(12), article number 2871. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14122871.
  13. Khosravi, H., Khoshru, B., Nosratabad, A.F., & Mitra, D. (2024). Exploring the landscape of biofertilizers containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Iran: Progress and research prospects. Current Research in Microbial Sciences, 7, article number 100268. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100268.
  14. Kozhushko, K.S. (2025). Comparative analysis of the effect of biostimulants on soybean sowing qualities under laboratory conditions. Agrarian Innovations, 33, 147-151. doi: 10.32848/agrar.innov.2025.33.24.
  15. Lamichhane, J.R., Corrales, D.C., & Soltani, E. (2022). Biological seed treatments promote crop establishment and yield: A global meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42, article number 45. doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00761-z.
  16. Majidian, P., Ghorbani, H.R., & Farajpour, M. (2024). Achieving agricultural sustainability through soybean production in Iran: Potential and challenges. Heliyon, 10(4), article number e26389. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26389.
  17. Mirriam, A., Mugwe, J., Raza, M.A., Seleiman, M.F., Maitra, S., & Gitari, H.H. (2022). Aggrandizing soybean yield, phosphorus use efficiency and economic returns under phosphatic fertilizer application and inoculation with BradyrhizobiumJournal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 22, 5086-5098. doi: 10.1007/s42729-022-00985-8.
  18. Nagrale, D.T., Chaurasia, A., Kumar, S., Gawande, S.P., Hiremani, N.S., Shankar, R., Gokte-Narkhedkar, N., Renu, & Prasad, Y.G. (2023). PGPR: The treasure of multifarious beneficial microorganisms for nutrient mobilization, pest biocontrol and plant growth promotion in field crops. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 39, article number 100. doi: 10.1007/s11274-023-03536-0.
  19. Neuhoff, D., Neumann, G., & Weinmann, M. (2024). Testing plant growth promoting microorganisms in the field: A proposal for standards. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, article number 1324665. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1324665.
  20. Panday, S.C., et al. (2024). Long-term fertilization strategies for improving productivity, profitability and water-use efficiency of soybean-wheat cropping systems. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 162(5), 444-457. doi: 10.1017/S0021859624000558.
  21. Paramesh, V., Kumar, R.M., Rajanna, G.A., Gowda, S., Nath, A.J., Madival, Y., Jinger, D., Bhat, S., & Toraskar, S. (2023). Integrated nutrient management for improving crop yields, soil properties, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, article number 1173258. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1173258.
  22. Patyal, D., Sachdeva, K., Sharma, K., Renuka, Panigrahi, C.K., Tutlani, A., & Khan, R.R. (2025). An innovative and sustainable seed coating technology for improving seed quality and crop performance. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 31(5), 597-607. doi: 10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i53056.
  23. Raza, A., Khare, T., Zhang, X., Rahman, M., Hussain, M., Gill, S.S., Chen, Z.-H., Zhou, M., Hu, Z., & Varshney, R.K. (2025). Novel strategies for designing climate‐smart crops to ensure sustainable agriculture and future food security. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, 4(2), article number e70048. doi: 10.1002/sae2.70048.
  24. Reed, L., & Glick, B.R. (2023). The recent use of plant-growth-promoting bacteria to promote the growth of agricultural food crops. Agriculture, 13(5), article number 1089. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13051089.
  25. Santos, F.M., Viera, L.S., Camargo, D.P., Muniz, M.F.B., Costa, I.F.D., Guedes, J.V.C., Santos, J.R.P., & Silva, J.C.P. (2022). Integrating a Bacillus‐based product with fungicides by foliar application to protect soybean: A sustainable approach to avoid exclusive use of chemicals. Pest Management Science, 78(11), 4832-4840. doi: 10.1002/ps.7104.
  26. Sible, C., & Below, F. (2023). Role of biologicals in enhancing nutrient efficiency in corn and soybean. Crops & Soils, 56(2), 13-19. doi: 10.1002/crso.20263.
  27. Tyagi, A., et al. (2024). A review on biocontrol agents as sustainable approach for crop disease management: Applications, production, and future perspectives. Horticulturae, 10(8), article number 805. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10080805.
  28. Villavicencio-Vásquez, M., Espinoza-Lozano, F., Espinoza-Lozano, L., & Coronel-León, J. (2025). Biological control agents: Mechanisms of action, selection, formulation and challenges in agriculture. Frontiers in Agronomy, 7, article number 1578915. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2025.1578915.
  29. Wan, N.-F., Dainese, M., Wang, Y.-Q., & Loreau, M. (2024). Cascading social-ecological benefits of biodiversity for agricultureCurrent Biology, 34(12), 587-603.
  30. Wu, Z., Chen, X., Lu, X., Zhu, Y., Han, X., Yan, J., Yan, L., & Zou, W. (2025). Impact of combined organic amendments and chemical fertilizers on soil microbial limitations, soil quality, and soybean yield. Plant and Soil, 507, 317-334. doi: 10.1007/s11104-024-06733-4.
  31. Zhong, Y.T., & Zhong, S.L. (2024). Advances in agronomic practices for high-yield soybean cultivation. Bioscience Methods, 15(6), 337-347. doi: 10.5376/bm.2024.15.0033.
  32. Zhou, W., Arcot, Y., Medina, R.F., Bernal, J., Cisneros-Zevallos, L., & Akbulut, M.E.S. (2024). Integrated pest management: An update on the sustainability approach to crop protectionACS Omega, 9(40), 41130-41147.