Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation

Efficiency assessment of regional plastic waste collection systems in mountain and border regions: A case study of the Upper Tisza Basin

Ruslan Shvarts, Oleg Glukh
Download article
Abstract

Mountain and border regions face pronounced challenges in organising efficient plastic waste collection due to complex terrain, dispersed settlement patterns and limited infrastructural capacity. These challenges are particularly critical in transboundary river basins, where mismanaged plastic waste generates cumulative downstream environmental risks. The Upper Tisza Basin, shared by Ukraine and several European Union countries, represents a high-risk area for riverine plastic transport and cross-border pollution. The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of regional plastic waste collection systems in mountain and border conditions and to identify key factors determining system performance. The research was based on a mixed-method approach combining municipal waste statistics, geospatial accessibility analysis, field observations and qualitative assessment of municipal documentation and publicly available operational reports. System efficiency was evaluated using quantitative indicators including plastic collection rate per capita, container coverage, collection frequency and terrain-adjusted logistical performance. The results revealed substantial spatial disparities in collection efficiency. Lowland municipalities achieved plastic collection rates of 9.8-12.3 kg per inhabitant per year, whereas mountainous municipalities collected only 3.2-5.7 kg per inhabitant per year. In mountainous areas, less than 50% of residents had access to collection points within a 300 m radius, compared to over 80% in lowland settlements. Logistical inefficiency in high-altitude municipalities was more than twice as high due to poor road accessibility and elevation changes. Community-driven initiatives, including decentralised collection hubs and river clean-up programmes, increased local collection efficiency by up to 30% in underserved areas. The findings demonstrated that improving plastic waste collection in mountain and border regions requires integrated solutions combining infrastructural optimisation, terrain-sensitive logistics, institutional coordination and community engagement. The proposed assessment framework could be applied to other transboundary mountain regions to enhance environmental safety and sustainable resource use

Keywords

plastic waste management; spatial accessibility; border areas; riverine pollution; collection efficiency; river basin management; environmental safety

Suggested citation
Shvarts, R., & Glukh, O. (2026). Efficiency assessment of regional plastic waste collection systems in mountain and border regions: A case study of the Upper Tisza Basin. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 17(2), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.31548/biologiya/2.2026.31
References
  1. Baltrocchi, A.P.D., Maggi, L., Carnevale Miino, M., Torretta, V., & Rada, E.C. (2024). Comparison of mixed and door-to-door systems for urban waste collection in terms of effectiveness and greenhouse gas emissions: A case study from two mountainous Italian valleys. Resources, 13(1), article number 17. doi: 10.3390/resources13010017.
  2. Bhandari, N.L., Bhattarai, S., Bhandari, G., Subedi, S., & Dhakal, K.N. (2021). A review on current practices of plastics waste management and future prospects. Journal of Institute of Science and Technology, 26(1), 107-118. doi: 10.3126/jist.v26i1.37837.
  3. Chen, C.C. (2010). Spatial inequality in municipal solid waste disposal across regions in developing countries. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 7, 447-456. doi: 10.1007/BF03326154.
  4. Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://dataspace.copernicus.eu/.
  5. Environmental Passport of Zakarpattia Region for 2022. (2023). Retrieved from https://ecozakarpat.gov.ua/wp-content/nd/2022_ecopasport.pdf.
  6. Environmental Passport of Zakarpattia Region for 2023. (2024). Retrieved from https://surl.li/ygrbrx.
  7. Di, J., Xi, K., & Yang, Y. (2025). An enhanced YOLOv8 model for accurate detection of solid floating waste. Scientific Reports, 15, article number 25015. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10163-2.
  8. Gallitelli, L., & Scalici, M. (2022). Riverine macroplastic gradient along watercourses: A global overview. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, article number 937944. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.937944.
  9. Interreg Danube Region. (2024). Policy guide released. Retrieved from https://interreg-danube.eu/projects/aquatic-plastic/news/policy-guide-released.
  10. Kiss, T., Fórián, S., Szatmári, G., & Sipos, G. (2021). Spatial distribution of microplastics in the fluvial sediments of a transboundary river – a case study of the Tisza River in Central Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 785, article number 147306. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147306.
  11. Kwikima, M.M., & Ngole, F. (2025). GIS-based optimization of solid waste collection points and routes: A case study of Majengo Ward, Sumbawanga Municipality, Tanzania. Cleaner Waste Systems, 12, article number 100372. doi: 10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100372.
  12. Leknoi, U., Painmanakul, P., Chawaloesphonsiya, N., Wimolsakcharoen, W., Samritthinanta, C., & Yiengthaisong, A. (2024). Building sustainable community: Insight from successful waste management initiative. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 24, article number 200238. doi: 10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200238.
  13. Liro, M., Zielonka, A., van Emmerik, T.H.M., Grodzińska-Jurczak, M., Liro, J., Kiss, T., & Mihai, F.C. (2023). Mountains of plastic: Mismanaged plastic waste along the Carpathian watercourses. Science of the Total Environment, 888, article number 164058. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164058.
  14. Mihai, F.-C., et al. (2022). Plastic pollution, waste management issues, and circular economy opportunities in rural communities. Sustainability, 14(1), article number 20. doi: 10.3390/su14010020.
  15. Nava, V., et al. (2024). Plastic pollution affects ecosystem processes including community structure and functional traits in large rivers. Water Research, 259, article number 121849. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121849.
  16. OpenStreetMap. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/51.44882/27.30139&layers=H.
  17. Owowenu, E.K., Nnadozie, C.F., Akamagwuna, F., Noundou, X.S., Uku, J.E., & Odume, O.N. (2023). A critical review of environmental factors influencing the transport dynamics of microplastics in riverine systems: Implications for ecological studies. Aquatic Ecology, 57, 557-570. doi: 10.1007/s10452-023-10029-7.
  18. Plastic Cup. (2023). CALL-Action reached 1200 tons. Retrieved from https://petkupa.hu/eng/?cikkId=call-action-reached-1200-tons.
  19. Popa, C.L., Dontu, S.I., Savastru, D., & Carstea, E.M. (2022). Role of citizen scientists in environmental plastic litter research – a systematic review. Sustainability, 14(20), article number 13265. doi: 10.3390/su142013265.
  20. Russell, C.E., Fernández, R., Parsons, D.R., & Gabbott, S.E. (2023). Plastic pollution in riverbeds fundamentally affects natural sand transport processes. Communications Earth & Environment, 4, article number 255. doi: 10.1038/s43247-023-00820-7.
  21. Shi, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2026). Marine plastic pollution governance: The role and challenges of international law. NPJ Emerging Contaminants, 2, article number 7. doi: 10.1038/s44454-025-00026-w.
  22. Shi, Y., Chen, W., Yang, S., Fan, Y., & Lu, L. (2024). Freshwater microplastics governance and sustainable development: Pollution status, interactions, policies, and prospective studies. Desalination and Water Treatment, 320, article number 100704. doi: 10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100704.
  23. State Statistics Service of Ukraine, & Main Department of Statistics in Zakarpattia Region. (2022). Demographic situation in the region in 2021. Retrieved from https://www.uz.ukrstat.gov.ua/catalog/2022/bulet_04.pdf.
  24. USGS EarthExplorer. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.
  25. van Emmerik, T.H.M., Frings, R.M., Schreyers, L.J., Hauk, R., de Lange, S.I., & Mellink, Y. A.M. (2023). River plastic transport and deposition amplified by extreme flood. Nature Water, 1, 514-522. doi: 10.1038/s44221-023-00092-7.
  26. Wang, S., Truffer, B., & Bai, X. (2025). Pathways towards successful urban community waste management: Insight from 26 experiments in China. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 57, article number 101032. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2025.101032.
  27. Zakarpattia Regional State Administration. (2021). Regional waste management plan of Zakarpattia Region until 2030. Retrieved from https://surl.li/dpulpt.
  28. Zhang, J., Ruan, R., & Bashir, M.J.K. (Eds.). (2023). Environmental pollution governance and ecological remediation technology. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-25284-6.
  29. Zhou, K., Zhang, J., Liu, H., & Fan, J. (2024). An integrated framework for assessing the multiscale environmental risks of domestic waste management systems in mountainous regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 108, article number 107597. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107597.