Production of transgenic root cultures of Artemisia annua L. and Artemisia vulgaris L., determination of biologically active compounds (artemisinin, flavonoids and sugars), and evaluation of biological activity (antioxidant and antiviral) in the obtained

Oleksandr Polishchuk , Yuliia Kolomyets
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the genetic transformation of Artemisia annua and Artemisia vulgaris roots using the bacterium Agrobacterium rhizogenes and to assess the impact of this process on the content and biological activity of selected compounds. The experiment, conducted under in vitro conditions, involved infection of young explants with A. rhizogenes strains ATCC 15834 and A4, followed by cultivation of transgenic roots in Murashige and Skoog liquid medium. Flavonoid concentration was determined spectrophotometrically using the aluminium chloride method, while antioxidant activity was assessed through DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging assays. Transformation efficiency reached 78.3% ± 4.2% for Artemisia annua and 65.0% ± 5.1% for Artemisia vulgaris, likely due to differences in the cell wall structure and the expression of receptors such as FLS2 and EFR. The artemisinin content in transgenic Artemisia annua roots reached 1.45 ± 0.15 mg per gram of dry weight, 3.2 times higher than that of the control group (0.45 ± 0.05 mg/g), whereas, in Artemisia vulgaris, the content was only 0.28 ± 0.03 mg/g. The flavonoid concentration amounted to 25.6 ± 2.1 mg quercetin equivalents per gram for Artemisia annua and 18.9 ± 1.7 mg quercetin equivalents per gram for Artemisia vulgaris. Antioxidant activity analysis showed that the half-maximal inhibitory concentration for Artemisia annua was 32.5 ± 2.8 µg/mL in the DPPH assay, which was 45% lower than the control. Extracts of Artemisia annua exhibited antiviral activity, inhibiting the replication of the influenza A/H1N1 virus by 68% ± 5%, whereas Artemisia vulgaris showed an inhibition rate of 55% ± 4%. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences between the species (p < 0.05). The results provide a foundation for the development of more effective preparations based on transgenic roots of Artemisia annua, particularly antimalarial agents with enhanced artemisinin content, as well as antioxidant and antiviral agents for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases

Keywords

genetic transformation; Agrobacterium rhizogenes; antimalarial agent; pharmaceutical preparations; anti-inflammatory properties

Suggested citation
Polishchuk , O., & Kolomyets, Yu. (2025). Production of transgenic root cultures of Artemisia annua L. and Artemisia vulgaris L., determination of biologically active compounds (artemisinin, flavonoids and sugars), and evaluation of biological activity (antioxidant and antiviral) in the obtained . Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 16(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.31548/biologiya/1.2025.33
References
  1. Al-Khayri, J.M., et al. (2022). Biotechnological approaches for production of artemisinin, an anti-malarial drug from Artemisia annua L. Molecules, 27(9), article number 3040. doi: 10.3390/molecules27093040.
  2. Bohdanovych, T.A., & Matvieieva, N.A. (2023). Effect of phenylalanine and light on the growth of hairy roots of Artemisia tilesii Ledeb. Biotechnologia Acta, 16(5), 61-69. doi: 10.15407/biotech16.05.061.
  3. Clark, M.S. (Ed.). (2013). Plant molecular biology – a laboratory manual. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
  4. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from  https://www.cbd.int/convention.  
  5. DuBois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A., & Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28(3), 350-356. doi: 10.1021/ac60111a017.
  6. Gelvin, S.B. (2003). Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: The biology behind the “gene-jockeying” tool. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 67(1), 16-37. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.67.1.16-37.2003.
  7. Hassani, D., Taheri, A., Fu, X., Qin, W., Hang, L., Ma, Y., & Tang, K. (2023). Elevation of artemisinin content by co-transformation of artemisinin biosynthetic pathway genes and trichome-specific transcription factors in Artemisia annua. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, article number 1118082. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1118082.
  8. Hooykaas-Van Slogteren, G.M.S., Hooykaas, P.J.J., & Schilperoort, R.A. (1984). Expression of Ti plasmid genes in monocotyledonous plants infected with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature, 311, 763-764. doi: 10.1038/311763a0.
  9. Judd, R., Dong, Y., Sun, X., Zhu, Y., Li, M., & Xie, D.Y. (2023). Metabolic engineering of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in Artemisia annua and relation to the expression of the artemisinin biosynthetic pathway. Planta, 257, article number 63. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04091-6.
  10. Kayani, S.-I., Ma, Y., Fu, X., Shen, Q., Li, Y., Rahman, S.-u., Peng, B., Huang, L., & Tang, K. (2023). JA-regulated AaGSW1–AaYABBY5/AaWRKY9 complex regulates artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. Plant and Cell Physiology, 64(7), 771-785. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcad035.
  11. Khan, A.N. (2024). Metabolic engineering of artemisia carvifolia buch by agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation with rol a gene for enhancement of flavonoids. (Doctoral dissertation, Capital University of Science and Technology).
  12. Khan, A.N., & Dilshad, E. (2023). Enhanced antioxidant and anticancer potential of Artemisia carvifolia Buch transformed with rol A Gene. Metabolites, 13(3), 351.  doi: 10.3390/metabo13030351.
  13. Kim, K.W., & Hwang, C.H. (2022). Enhanced biosynthesis of artemisinin by environmental stresses in Artemisia annua. Journal of Plant Biotechnology, 49(4), 307-315. doi: 10.5010/JPB.2022.49.4.307.
  14. Kralemann, L., de Pater, S., Shen, H., Kloet, S., van Schendel, R., Hooykaas, P., & Tijsterman, M. (2021). T-DNA integration in plants requires MRE11-or TDP2-mediated removal of the 5’bound Agrobacterium protein VirD2. Retrieved from doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1144888/v1.
  15. Lacroix, B., & Citovsky, V. (2022). Genetic factors governing bacterial virulence and host plant susceptibility during Agrobacterium infection. Advances in Genetics, 110, 1-29.  doi: 10.1016/bs.adgen.2022.08.001.
  16. Li, J., Chu, X.H., Wang, X.Y., Feng, B.M., & Yu, Z.X. (2021). Aging affects artemisinin synthesis in Artemisia annua. Scientific Reports, 11(1), article number 11297. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90807-1.   
  17. Li, X., Yang, Q., Peng, L., Tu, H., Lee, L.Y., Gelvin, S. B., & Pan, S.Q. (2020). Agrobacterium-delivered VirE2 interacts with host nucleoporin CG1 to facilitate the nuclear import of VirE2-coated T complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(42), 26389-26397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009645117.
  18. Lopes, E.M., et al. (2020). Artemisia annua L. and photoresponse: From artemisinin accumulation, volatile profile and anatomical modifications to gene expression. Plant Cell Reports, 39, 101-117. doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02476-0.
  19. Mirbehbahani, F.S., Hejazi, F., Najmoddin, N., & Asefnejad, A. (2020). Artemisia annua L. as a promising medicinal plant for powerful wound healing applications. Progress in Biomaterials, 9, 139-151. doi: 10.1007/s40204-020-00138-z.
  20. Qamar, F., Mishra, A., Ashrafi, K., Saifi, M., Dash, P.K., Kumar, S., & Abdin, M.Z. (2024). Increased artemisinin production in Artemisia annua L. by co-overexpression of six key biosynthetic enzymes. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 281, article number 136291. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136291.
  21. Septembre-Malaterre, A., et al. (2020). Artemisia annua, a traditional plant brought to light. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(14), article number 4986. doi: 10.3390/ijms21144986.
  22. Shu, G., et al. (2022). Molecular insights into AabZIP1-mediated regulation on artemisinin biosynthesis and drought tolerance in Artemisia annua. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 12(3), 1500-1513. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.09.026.
  23. Soni, R., Shankar, G., Mukhopadhyay, P., & Gupta, V. (2022). A concise review on Artemisia annua L.: A major source of diverse medicinal compounds. Industrial Crops and Products, 184, article number 115072. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115072.
  24. Stachel, S.E., Messens, E., Van Montagu, M., & Zambryski, P. (1985). Identification of the signal molecules produced by wounded plant cells that activate T-DNA transfer in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature, 318, 624-629. doi: 10.1038/318624a0.
  25. Wan, L., et al. (2023). RNA sequencing in Artemisia annua L explored the genetic and metabolic responses to hardly soluble aluminum phosphate treatment. Functional & Integrative Genomics, 23, 141. doi: 10.1007/s10142-023-01067-3.
  26. Wan, L., et al. (2024). Genetics and metabolic responses of Artemisia annua L to the lake of phosphorus under the sparingly soluble phosphorus fertilizer: Evidence from transcriptomics analysis. Functional & Integrative Genomics, 24(1), article number 26. doi: 10.1007/s10142-024-01301-6.
  27. Wani, K.I., Choudhary, S., Zehra, A., Naeem, M., Weathers, P., & Aftab, T. (2021). Enhancing artemisinin content in and delivery from Artemisia annua: A review of alternative, classical, and transgenic approaches. Planta, 254, article number 29. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03676-3.
  28. Yin, Q., Xiang, L., Han, X., Zhang, Y., Lyn, R., Yuan, L., & Chen, S. (2024). The evolutionary advantage of artemisinin production by Artemisia annua. Trends in Plant Science, 30(2), 213-226. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2024.09.006.
  29. Zhishen, J., Mengcheng, T., & Jianming, W. (1999). The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chemistry, 64(4), 555-559. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2.
  30. Zhou, Z., et al. (2020). Trichome and artemisinin regulator 2 positively regulates trichome development and artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. New Phytologist, 228(3), 932-945.  doi: 10.1111/nph.16777.